Barroso Has No ‘Plan B’ Ready

The EU Observer has the following:

The President of the European Commission has called for a French yes to the European Constitution, pointing out that there will not be a “plan B” if France rejects the treaty next week……….But Mr Barroso asserted there was no plan B in case the French rejected the treaty.

“We desire that ‘yes’, the ratification in all the 25 countries. Frankly, there is no plan B”.

The Commission’s president also rejected the possibility of re-negotiating the document in the case of a no vote.

“We are 25. With all the respect to each country, there are all the other countries – the ones that have already ratified it, the ones that will probably ratify it. It would not be realistic to re-open negotiations now”.

How does the saying go: never say never. Barroso’s performace here is frankly extremely dissapointing. In the first place it is obvious that he wants a yes, what he needs to do is offer French voters reasons for that yes, not threats about what might happen if they don’t conform. Also he should have side stepped any comments about a hypothetical ‘no’. We’ll deal with that on the day we have to deal with it, should have been the response. Not really what you expect from a President.

This entry was posted in A Few Euros More, The European Union and tagged , , , by Edward Hugh. Bookmark the permalink.

About Edward Hugh

Edward 'the bonobo is a Catalan economist of British extraction. After being born, brought-up and educated in the United Kingdom, Edward subsequently settled in Barcelona where he has now lived for over 15 years. As a consequence Edward considers himself to be "Catalan by adoption". He has also to some extent been "adopted by Catalonia", since throughout the current economic crisis he has been a constant voice on TV, radio and in the press arguing in favor of the need for some kind of internal devaluation if Spain wants to stay inside the Euro. By inclination he is a macro economist, but his obsession with trying to understand the economic impact of demographic changes has often taken him far from home, off and away from the more tranquil and placid pastures of the dismal science, into the bracken and thicket of demography, anthropology, biology, sociology and systems theory. All of which has lead him to ask himself whether Thomas Wolfe was not in fact right when he asserted that the fact of the matter is "you can never go home again".