Remarkable.
I guess he figured the truth would come out anyway. I’m sure he would disapprove of my headline, but can’t see how else one could interpret his remarks. Or am I being shrill?
The news reports are unsatisfactory. It sounds as if he wasn’t very apologetic. How did he justify his behaviour?
I’m hoping Edward will give us a more informed take.
He also admitted having taken with him some important secret papers without the new government’s knowledge.
Original link (in spanish).
“Knew” seems to be too strong a word.
They only said ETA was a prime suspect, which makes sense. Everyone immediately thought of ETA.
The fact that they said they had left open the possibility of foreign terrorists shows a wide-ranging investigation. Islamic militants were never ruled out. No one “knew” definitively, after just 2 days, that the muslim terrorists did it.