Coup de Grace for Italy, or for the SGP?

Well I got it wrong (or so it seems). Someone has ‘leaked’ to the FT the news that Italy will be ‘given two years grace’ on the deficit problem. If this is confirmed I suppose it shows that the Commission fears more the Italian voters than it does the international financial markets. Obviously a ‘to the letter of the law’ application of the revised SGP would present Italy with hard economic decisions (which she will face anyway), but not applying it tests yet one more time the credibility of the EU’s institutions. It depends I suppose which you think is more damaging in the long run.

Here’s a short extract from the FT article:

The move, to be announced on Wednesday by the European Commission, offers some breathing space to the embattled government, on Monday confronted with worrying evidence of a prolonged recession.

A survey by Confindustria, the employers’ association, indicated that industrial production in the first half of the year had fallen 0.7 per cent from the preceding half-year.

Production also declined narrowly this month from May, pointing to a possible third consecutive quarter of declining gross domestic product and therefore keeping the economy in recession. The numbers offered a fresh glimpse of the scale of the task facing Silvio Berlusconi and his government in reviving Italy’s ailing economy and turning around the state’s budgetary crisis. Rome has already admitted that it will breach the stability pact’s deficit ceiling of 3 per cent of GDP this year, and probably next year as well.

This entry was posted in A Fistful Of Euros, Economics: Currencies and tagged by Edward Hugh. Bookmark the permalink.

About Edward Hugh

Edward 'the bonobo is a Catalan economist of British extraction. After being born, brought-up and educated in the United Kingdom, Edward subsequently settled in Barcelona where he has now lived for over 15 years. As a consequence Edward considers himself to be "Catalan by adoption". He has also to some extent been "adopted by Catalonia", since throughout the current economic crisis he has been a constant voice on TV, radio and in the press arguing in favor of the need for some kind of internal devaluation if Spain wants to stay inside the Euro. By inclination he is a macro economist, but his obsession with trying to understand the economic impact of demographic changes has often taken him far from home, off and away from the more tranquil and placid pastures of the dismal science, into the bracken and thicket of demography, anthropology, biology, sociology and systems theory. All of which has lead him to ask himself whether Thomas Wolfe was not in fact right when he asserted that the fact of the matter is "you can never go home again".