Serbia’s Radical Party: strange convulsions

“Strange are the convulsions of defeat.” — Winston Churchill

So Serbia’s Radical Party, having lost two Presidential and three Parliamentary elections in a row, is breaking up. Sort of.

If you’re not a Serbia-watcher, here’s the short version: the Radicals are Serbia’s Obnoxious Populist Nationalist Party. Most Balkan countries have OPMPs. If they can corner the entire OPMP vote, they typically poll around 25%… sometimes lower, never much higher. Which in most places makes them a nuisance, maybe a very large nuisance, but not a serious threat.

What makes the Radicals different from, say, “Attack” in Bulgaria or Vadim Tudor’s Greater Romania Party is Serbia’s unhappy recent history. While “Attack” and such may have a lot of members who fantasize wistfully about gathering members of unpopular and despised minorities together, killing them, and dumping their bodies in a nearby large body of water, the Radical Party includes a number of people who have actually done so. In fact, its leader is currently on trial in the Hague for war crimes.

This means that the Radicals are simply unacceptable to most of the international community. This in turn means that, because the Radicals consistently claim around a quarter of the popular vote, Serbia has to keep forming weird coalition governments in order to not incude them. (It’s worse than it sounds because of the way voting in Serbia works. About a fifth [correction — more like a twentieth] of all votes get wasted because they’re for parties that don’t reach a 5% cutoff for representation in Parliament. So, when seats in Parliament are awarded, the Radicals take not a quarter but more like a third.)

So the Radicals have been a huge headache — not so much to the international community as to other Serbian politicians. The fact that they’re really obnoxious in opposition, throwing lots of brickbats and mugging for the cameras without ever offering constructive help, is just gravy.

Until this week. When Radical leader Seselj went off to the Hague, he appointed his deputy Tomislav Nikolic to lead the party in his absence. Which Nikolic has loyally done for the last several years.

But last week Nikolic had enough. The details are unclear — at least to me — but it looks like Seselj, or someone, went over his head to give instructions to the party’s MPs on how to vote on Serbia’s SAA agreement. (Which is another long and fascinating story in itself. Maybe later.) Whereupon Nikolic stepped down as party leader.

Nikolic’s official explanation is that he “has his dignity”, which presumably is politician-ese for “I’m tired of being overruled and ignored by a guy who’s been in a jail cell for the last five and a half years.” However, it’s worth keeping in mind that, in those five and a half years, Nikolic has lost a whole bunch of elections. Being leader of the opposition — again — probably isn’t looking so good. So, why not separate himself from the stink of flop sweat (hey, those lost elections weren’t his fault! He’s a very attractive candidate!) and do something more interesting?

Which he has: Nikolic has formed his own political club, “Forward Serbia”. And so far, 11 out of the 78 Radical MPs have peeled off to join him.

It’s unclear what “political club” means here. It would be difficult, and possibly unconstitutional, for Nikolic to form his own political party. Serbia, like many former Communist countries, used to have a big problem with MPs hopping from party to party. So the current Serbian constitution allows the parties to enforce loyalty — for instance, by having members sign undated letters of resignation, which the party leadership can hold. So Nikolic can’t really form a new party — but he can form a “club”, which presumably will vote as it pleases, and may perhaps develop its own organization and finances. And might perhaps evolve into a new party, if they can negotiate the legal issues.

The new Radical Party leadership isn’t happy about this, of course, but there’s not much they can do. Nikolic announced — I am not making this up — that he had “lost” the unsigned resignation letters. (Remember, he was the party’s leader. So he was the guy holding them for safekeeping. Whoops.) It’s unclear whether “Forward Serbia” will become a new party, or will just be a loudly disaffected Siamese twin to the Radicals. But either way, it’s a major hassle for them.

There hasn’t been much attention or response to this yet from the rest of the world. And I don’t know how it’s playing out among Serbian watches. (Commenters?)

But speaking only for myself? Popcorn, please.

This entry was posted in Governments and parties and tagged by Douglas Muir. Bookmark the permalink.

About Douglas Muir

American with an Irish passport. Does development work for a big international donor. Has been living in Eastern Europe for the last six years -- first Serbia, then Romania, and now Armenia. Calls himself a Burkean conservative, which would be a liberal in Germany but an unhappy ex-Republican turned Democrat in the US. Husband of Claudia. Parent of Alan, David, Jacob and Leah. Likes birds. Writes Halfway Down The Danube. Writes Halfway Down The Danube.

11 thoughts on “Serbia’s Radical Party: strange convulsions

  1. Can Nikolic enforce the loyalty to himself by finding and using the resignation letters of 67 Radical MPs who did not join his club?

  2. Just a few corrections:

    – Saying that “a fifth” of all votes is waster is an overstatement. Yes, some votes get wasted, but in the end, it all amounts to no more than 5 parliament members. The reason SRS has more: they actually have ~30% of the voters (somewhere over a million); in fact, SRS is known as having a very disciplined voting body.

    – Re: “political club”. I’m not exactly sure on all the details, but as I understand, speaking time (for example) is divided between the clubs, and the presidents of the political clubs have regular consultations with the… uhh, chairman? over what’ll be disscussed in the next session. Because of that, having one is usually very beneficial – for example, the minor parties in the ZES coallition all have their own clubs.

    Adrian: I very much doubt he’ll do that. Breaking away from SRS is a very good chance to start with a clean(er) image, and such a move would definitely tarnish it.

    My own take on the situation? Definitely fairly interesting, and I can certainly see where Nikolić is coming from – while he was “running the show” the party went from 300k to 1.3 mil voters. In addition, he has always been more moderate than Å eÅ¡elj. It will also be interesting to see where Vučić will go (a high ranking SRS official). BTW, for those keeping a running tally, Nikolić’s club has 19 members today (I’m not exactly sure whether this includes him or not), out of the total 78 SRS has.

  3. vp, you’re quite correct — it’s more like 1/20th of all votes. Don’t know what I was thinking, there.

    The Radicals got 29%, which was their all-time high water mark. But, well.

    You know: if Nikolic creates a new party somehow, he’d be placed to compete with the Socialists for membership in the government. That would be amusing.

    Doug M.

  4. Pingback: Davos Newbies » Blog Archive » GOP = OPNP

  5. Pingback: One more step « Land Next Door

  6. Doug wrote “if Nikolic creates a new party somehow, he’d be placed to compete with the Socialists for membership in the government.”

    Nikolic broadened the party from just an ethnic/racist party (that can only get 5 to 10% of the votes)) to a truly populist party that also talks about corruption, poverty and other issues that appeal to the common man.

    It looks like Seselj didn’t like this very much. When after the last elections the party had some chance to form a government he more or less destroyed that with his praise for the murder of ĐinÄ‘ić.

    It is my impression that Nikolic has a good chance to form a core for the opposition that may one day replace the present government. The SPS would seem the natural party for that role (like the former communists elsewhere), but they seem unable to find a broader audience.

  7. Pingback: Global Voices Online » Serbia: Radical Party

  8. Pingback: The Radical Bloc shatters at Belgrade Foreign Visitors Club

  9. “Nikolic broadened the party from just an ethnic/racist party (that can only get 5 to 10% of the votes)) to a truly populist party that also talks about corruption, poverty and other issues that appeal to the common man.”

    with racism still being the core of their hateful party. Their leader advocated killing Croats with rusty spoons and infecting Albanians with the AIDS virus. Sadly, that may qualify as populist in Serbia.

  10. Pingback: Land Next Door » Blog Archive » One more step

Comments are closed.