Slovenia Has a Better Second Quarter, But the Slump Continues

Sovenian GDP fell by 9.3 percent in the second quarter of this year when compared to the second quarter of 2008. This was the third quarter in a row which has seen a fall in Slovene GDP, and the was the deepest annual drop so far in the current economic crisis. In the first half of 2009, GDP decreased by 8.8 percent compared to the same period of 2008. On the other hand, seasonally and working day adjusted GDP increased by 0.7 percent compared to the first quarter of 2009 technically making a break in the recession.

But before we get too excited about this fact, we need to consider that this escape from recession was simply a technical detail, and due to movement in the trade impact. Both exports and imports fell sharply – exports of goods and services by an annual 21.3 percent and imports of goods and services by 24.8 percent, so since exports decreased less than imports the external trade balance contributed +3.1 percentage points to GDP annual volume growth, or put another way, without the slump in imports the drop in GDP would have been even stronger. Of course, it sounds funny to say you come out of recession when living standards actually fall.

In addition, gross capital formation slumped, falling by 36.7 percent over the second quarter of 2008. In the January-June period, gross capital formation decreased by one third compared to the same period of 2008 and its share in GDP fell from 32.2 percent in 2008 to 22.1 percent.

So exports, imports and investment are all still falling.

GDP Continues In A Slump

Slovenia’s economy sank deeper into a recession in the second quarter as a slump in industrial production, investment and construction continued. Gross domestic product contracted an annual 9.3 percent after shrinking 8.5 percent in the first three months. Slovenia, which the wealthiest nation among the Eastern Europe countries that joined the 27-nation bloc since 2004, is battling with its worst economic decline in almost two decades as demand waned for its exports, which make up two-thirds of total GDP.


Underlying the drop in GDP is a sharp fall in manufacturing activity, which is the result of a large drop in exports. In fact industrial output shrank for the ninth consecutive month in June, plunging an annual 22.3 percent after a 19.8 percent drop in May. A decline in in output was seen in all industries. Mining and quarrying output fell 4%, while manufacturing output dropped 23.2%. Compared to May, industrial output fell 0.1%. In the first six months of the year, output declined 21.1% compared to the same period last year.

June contruction activity was down by 1.4% over May, and by 15.9% over June 2008. New buildings were down by 23.9% and civil engineering work by 10.2%.

Retail sales rose slightly – by 1.2% – in July over June, but were down 10.6% over July 2008 according to national statistics office data.

Unemployment has been rising steadily, but fell back slightly to 6% in July, from 6.1% in June according to seasonally adjusted Eurostat data.

Producer prices, often seen as an early predictor of inflation, had their biggest annual drop on record in July on the back of falling demand both internally and externally. Prices of goods leaving factories and mines declined an annual 3 percent, falling for the fourth consecutive month, after a 2.4 percent decrease in June. Prices fell 0.2 percent month on month from June. Consumer-prices an annual basis according to the National Statistics Office methodology, in yet another sign that the country is likely to face an extended period of mild price deflation. Measured with the EU harmonised index of consumer prices, in August 2009 both monthly and annual inflation were running at a slightly positive 0.1%.

Given that the Slovenian economy is now almost entirely export dependent, such a deflationary process is inevitable (the so called eurozone “internal devaluation” mechanism) since if we look at the chart below we can see that Slovenia’s Real Effective Exchange Rate with the benchmark country Germany has deteriorated sharply since 2004, indicating a significant loss of competitiveness which will now need to be clawed back.


However, the correction won’t be an easy one if we look at comparative levels of inflation using the EU HICP methodology, since in fact while German consumer prices fell year on year in July and August – by 0.7%. Slovenia’s prices have risen faster than German ones all year and were still rising, if only marginally, in August, which means that Slovenia has still been losing competitiveness with Germany even as 2009 has progressed.

The government strategy is currently to support the economy with stimulus spending, and this together with a return in demand from western Europe will bring economic recovery next year after the country tumbled into what was the deepest contraction in the euro region in Q1, according to Finance Minister Franc Krizanic.

The government plan to spend about 15 percent of GDP this year in an attempt to growth, which is currently forecast to show a full-year contraction of 4 percent. To finance this spending the administration have announced the sale of about 4.5 billion euros in Eurobonds, which will include funding to back a 1.2 billion-euro guarantee to help exporters such as appliance maker Gorenje Group and car maker Renault’s Slovenian unit.

Such stimulus measures will of course increase the Slovenian deficit, and will only be justified if it is used to support the economy while the much needed correction is carried out. That is to say, the measures will only be justified if the aid in the internal devaluation process, which will be the key to success or failure. Unfortunately, as I say, this process has yet to begin.

This entry was posted in A Fistful Of Euros, Economics: Country briefings by Edward Hugh. Bookmark the permalink.

About Edward Hugh

Edward 'the bonobo is a Catalan economist of British extraction. After being born, brought-up and educated in the United Kingdom, Edward subsequently settled in Barcelona where he has now lived for over 15 years. As a consequence Edward considers himself to be "Catalan by adoption". He has also to some extent been "adopted by Catalonia", since throughout the current economic crisis he has been a constant voice on TV, radio and in the press arguing in favor of the need for some kind of internal devaluation if Spain wants to stay inside the Euro. By inclination he is a macro economist, but his obsession with trying to understand the economic impact of demographic changes has often taken him far from home, off and away from the more tranquil and placid pastures of the dismal science, into the bracken and thicket of demography, anthropology, biology, sociology and systems theory. All of which has lead him to ask himself whether Thomas Wolfe was not in fact right when he asserted that the fact of the matter is "you can never go home again".

One thought on “Slovenia Has a Better Second Quarter, But the Slump Continues

  1. “Of course, it sounds funny to say you come out of recession when living standards actually fall.”

    That is correct, but it contradicts the talk about “internal devaluation”.Obviously the prices that affect international competitiveness are export producer prices , not the CPI. Japan and Germany have always maintained elevated levels of domestic consumer prices in order to finance their export strategy. A rising CPI is exactly what Slovenia, Spain etc. should expect. Falling prices do, after all, imply more affordable consumption and are not a priori indicative of a reduction in living standards. With respect to Euro countries the term “internal devaluation” is just misleading. It is, at best, a kind of “non-external external devaluation” – precisely the same thing that has happened to California, which – looked at in isolation – is one of the ten biggest economies on earth, but which also suffered from high population growth and has changed from being the “golden state” to being number 48 out of 50 U.S. states in terms of prosperity if its higher-than-average increases in the cost of living are taken into account. New York, by the way, places last among the 50 states once its 30% higher-than-average cost of living is accounted for.

    BTW, I am not implying that the deflation-that-is-actually-inflation strategy will work. But having economists do a bit of doubletalk that they are not even aware of certainly looks like the policy-consensus part of the equation has been solved. I also don’t see any alternatives. Not calling a spade a spade still isn’t the right thing to do, though.

Comments are closed.