The ever readable Martin Wolf has been writing in the FT on Italy:
“Let us think the unthinkable: could the eurozone disintegrate? The answer is yes. Disappearance of the zone as a whole seems hugely unlikely, so long as the commitment to the European project survives. But the exit of one (or more) members, a sovereign default or both is not at all inconceivable.”
“Yet those all-powerful watchdogs, the bond markets, apparently disagree. Interest rate spreads within the eurozone are tiny. Investors apparently consider the debt of the eurozone governments as close to perfect substitutes. This is astonishing: after all, ratios of government debt to gross domestic product at the end of last year varied from Luxembourg’s 5 per cent and Ireland’s 29 per cent to Italy’s 105 per cent and Greece’s 112 per cent (on the Maastricht treaty definition). Investors must not only believe that the currency union is impregnable but that each sovereign borrower is as good as the other. The latter belief assumes that all the fiscal authorities will behave in an equally responsible manner or that there is an implicit bail-out. These assumptions are highly implausible.
The rest is behind the firewall, but it isn’t difficult to imagine what he says. To me what he is saying is obvious, the curios question is why so few can see it.