“Saying that the situation is the same for all central and eastern European states, I don’t see that……you cannot compare the dire situation in Hungary with that of other countries.”
Angela Merkel, Brussels, Sunday
“Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way”
Tolstoy
In Europe, leaders rejected pleas for a comprehensive rescue plan for troubled East European economies, promising instead to provide “case-by-case†support. That means a slow dribble of funds, with no chance of reversing the downward spiral.
Paul Krugman
Bank regulators from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Slovakia met today and issued a joint statement, ostensibly to reduce the some of the impact of what they term “alarmist comments” from the Austrian government about how the regional banking system is now in such a precarious state that it requires urgent action at EU level to prevent meltdown. The Austrian government are, of course, concerned about the impact of any meltdown on their own banking system. The result of this “reassuring statement” can be seen in the chart below (10 years, HUF vs Euro).
Within minutes of the joint statement Hungary’s currency plummeted to an all-time low against the euro and to a 6.5-yr low versus the US dollar. In fact the HUF rapidly depreciated to 312 per euro from 307.50 before climbing back in later trading to 310. And the reason for this swift reaction? Hungary was not invited to join the statement. As the forint plunged, Hungary ‘s banking regulator hurriedly signed up to the statement, blaming the original omission on a communications mess-up, but the damage was already done.
“Each of the CEE Member States has its own specific economic and financial situation and these countries do not constitute a homogenous region. It is thus important first to distinguish between the EU Member States and the non-EU countries and also to clarify issues specific to particular countries or particular banking groups.”
Well this just takes us back to Tolstoy, each of them have their own specific problems, but the underlying reality is that they all face problems, and are vulnerable, each in their own way.
Hungary’s economic fundamentals are clearly much weaker than those to be found in the Czech Republic and Poland as things stand, but what about Bulgaria and Romania? And the Czech Republic and Poland are about to have a pretty hard time of it as a result of their export dependence on the West, and Poland has the unwinding of the zloty options scandal still to hit the front pages. So there is plenty of food for thought here before throwing Hungary to the wolves. A default in Hungary could very easily lead to contagion elsewhere, and then the impact in the West is very hard to foresee. We should not be playing round with lighted matches right next to our fireworks stock. “Hey, it’s dark in here” and then “boom”.
Yesterday it was Latvia’s turn, and the cost of protecting against a Latvian default (Latvia is the first European Union member priced at so- called distressed levels) rose to a record following the announcement that the unemployement level rose from 8.3% in December to 9.5% in January, the highest level in nearly nine years. In fact credit-default swaps linked to Latvia increased nine basis points to an all-time high of 1,109 basis points, according to CMA Datavision in London. The cost is above the 1,000 level, breached last week, that investors consider distressed, and is now about 270 basis points above contracts linked to Lithuania, the next-highest EU member.
So two countries are being systematically detached here – Latvia and Hungary – and statements by EU leaders are unwittingly aiding and abetting the process. But we should all remember, after they have eaten Latvia and Hungary for breakfast, the financial markets will undoubtedly chew on other luckless countries over lunch (Romania’s Q4 GDP data was out today, and it was a shocker, and S&P have already said they are “closely monitoring” the situation), before perhaps moving on to bigger game for supper.
And we should remember here, no one is too big to fall, and I have already been warning about the gravity of Germany’s situation, with a rapidly ageing population, a hefty bank bailout of its own to swallow, and total export dependence for GDP growth. Final data from Markit economics out today showed that Germany’s composite PMI fell to 36.3 in February from 38.0 in January. That was the lowest level registered since the series began in January 1998. And it means that the German economy – which is highly interlocked with the whole of Eastern Europe (Austria holds the finance and Germany the industrial exposure) – is certainly contracting more rapidly in the first quarter of this year than it was in the last quarter of 2008, and may well contract in whole year 2009 by something in the order of 5%. Further evidence comes from the latest VDMA machine producers association report which shows that exports orders for German engineering companies were 47 per cent down on a year earlier in January. Overall industrial machinery orders were 42 per cent lower than in January 2008, with domestic orders down 31 per cent, while foreign orders fell 47 per cent. This is more or less Japan territory in its scale. So maybe someone over there in Germany should be reading the poem you will see below to “our Angela” right now, just so she doesn’t miss the point (Oh, and if you don’t speak German, you can find a translation here).
Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich nicht protestiert;
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
Als sie die Juden holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Jude.
Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.

An interesting piece in Alphaville about CEE countries:
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/03/04/53194/cees-stand-against-spectre-lators/
where you will read about $65bn CEE’s debt inflated to $1700bn and financial institutions speculating in emerging markets with bailout’s money.
Didn’t those guys do enough harm in the US? Do they deserve bailout’s or a swift trial?
Hello Michael,
“An interesting piece in Alphaville about CEE countries”
Yep, I saw that article. Izabella Kaminska is quite on the ball about these East Europe bank problems. As she says FT Alphaville never entirely convinced everything was as rosy in the region as was being made out. They weren’t taken in by all the propaganda that the exposure was trivial, and all the forex lending was simply an innocent detail.
The Bank for International Settlements were absolutely right to draw attention to the $1700bn (1.3 billion euros) in Western Bank lending to the East which is at the heart of the problem. Only a fool would have imagined that the East were going to default on all of this. In Ukraine the best estimate is that only 60% of lending is at risk of default, and even after this there will be some recovery of bad debt.
“Do they deserve bailout’s or a swift trial?”
Well the problem is a hard one, since if we do bail them out they may only ruin these Eastern economies again with so much easy lending, and if they don’t get bailed out then the banking crisis in Italy, Austria and Belgium might be such that the Eurozone may not withstand the blow.
What actually is the world trying to save here?
From the previous comment:
…“Do they deserve bailout’s or a swift trial?â€
Well the problem is a hard one, since if we do bail them out they may only ruin these Eastern economies again with so much easy lending, and if they don’t get bailed out then the banking crisis in Italy, Austria and Belgium might be such that the Eurozone may not withstand the blow…
That sounds to me like an informed assessment that the Eurozone is not sustainable. Maybe it never was.
The world should look at investment opportunities in India and Asia.
Europe needs to sit down and decide what they want to do. That likely will mean protectorate status for some countries and amalgamation of those countries that really are not countries (using a gentleman’s definition).
We seem to have a continual “Henny Penny” press release every few days from Europe.
The poem is out of context.
Now, what choice does Angie have? Lets say she manages the best case and save “New Europe” (Why are they not begging from the US?) – how is she going to sell this to her voters? Germans voters have been paying for the unification. They know exactly what 1.5 trillion Euro mean and how long it takes to pay them back. Germany has no upside. The best way for the German chancellor (even without reelection this year) is not to play the game. Even if they are sympathetic to a bailout, they need somebody else to jump in. ECB maybe or the IMF? Some outsider who can become the fall guy.
Issue eurobonds and spread out the responsibility…
It seems a logical solution for Merkel’s dilemma, at least more logical than expecting that everything will be all right with this voodoo measures. And far less ridiculous than siding with the Estonian premier saying that Estonia has no serious problems…