Author Archives: Edward Hugh

About Edward Hugh

Edward 'the bonobo is a Catalan economist of British extraction. After being born, brought-up and educated in the United Kingdom, Edward subsequently settled in Barcelona where he has now lived for over 15 years. As a consequence Edward considers himself to be "Catalan by adoption". He has also to some extent been "adopted by Catalonia", since throughout the current economic crisis he has been a constant voice on TV, radio and in the press arguing in favor of the need for some kind of internal devaluation if Spain wants to stay inside the Euro. By inclination he is a macro economist, but his obsession with trying to understand the economic impact of demographic changes has often taken him far from home, off and away from the more tranquil and placid pastures of the dismal science, into the bracken and thicket of demography, anthropology, biology, sociology and systems theory. All of which has lead him to ask himself whether Thomas Wolfe was not in fact right when he asserted that the fact of the matter is "you can never go home again".

Barroso Changing His Position?

Posted on by

This piece in the FT seems to suggest that Barroso may in fact be moving away from the ‘bsuiness as usual’ line:

The European Union was on Monday braced for a wave of possible No votes against the EU constitution, after French voters decisively rejected it.Officially EU leaders stuck to the line that all member states should ratify the treaty as normal, but privately there are growing doubts about whether that is possible.

José Manuel Barroso, European Commission president, admitted there was “a risk of contagion” with hostility to the treaty spreading to other countries. ….

The Economist On The Result

Posted on by

The Economist is more or less positive about the outcome, of course it probably didn’t favour the constitution anyway:

French voters have rejected the proposed European Union constitution by a decisive margin. The flawed constitution is now probably dead, though the EU will get by without it. For President Jacques Chirac, however, it is a crushing defeat

Incidentally the Economist is now putting virtually all the Glbal Agenda section. I don’t know what this portends for their online influence.

Here Comes the First ‘Issue’

Posted on by

The Chinese, as is often the case, are showing that they have an uncanny knack for putting their finger exactly on the sore spot:

“Beijing on Sunday criticised the European Union’s plans to restrict imports of textile products amid heightened controversy surrounding the threat Chinese clothing exports pose to the world’s manufacturers.”

“A spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce, Chong Quan, said that the EU’s efforts to limit importsof some clothing products from China were rash and unfair…..It is an inaccurate assessment and an incorrect decision,? said Mr Chong of the EU’s latest move. ?It not only sends the wrong signal of trade protectionism to the European industry, but also seriously harms the rights that Chinese enterprises are allowed to enjoy in the global textile trade.?

Really I would say that the timing of this response from China is very much to the point. The EU has now to ‘interpret’ yesterday’s vote and answer. Do Europeans want more protectionism, or should we press ahead with a new and improved Doha round (including the reform of agricultural subsidies, which of course, will not be popular in France). After giving the Bush administration the runaround on currency reform over the last six months, it appears Beijing may now be about to give the EU a little more attention. The really interesting detail will be to see the response. I think this is what might give financial markets a first hint of where we are going.

Roses in Picardy

Posted on by

In part this vote may be decided by differing participation rates across the regions. It is clear that in some Departments the participation rates are very high. I just heard a reporter in Picardy. Apparently the anti-Maastricht (remember even the Maastricht vote was only a ‘petit oui’) sentiment was high in Picardy. Today they have a high participation. It is such factors, local and regional ones like this, which may in the end decide the vote. Strange to think that the future of Europe may be in the hands of a number of voters ‘on the margin’ over in Piccardy, and similar.

Update One: An estimate for Radio France by CSA suggest a participation as high as 82.5%. One thing is sure, the big news about this referendum, apart from the result that is, will be the participation. No-one can say this isn’t representative. Meantime the metro stations around the Chanmps Elysee have been closed – the police fear spontaneous demonstrations (of joy presumeably). The left have called for a celebratory ‘fevstival’ in the Place de la Bastille at 22:00.

BTW: it is now 20:00. All stations outside Paris and Lyon are now closed.

Update 2: The CSA has now backed off a bit, and the participation will be something in the 70’s %.

Blogging The French Referendum

Posted on by

Update I: Participation rates at 19:00 have just been released: 66,24 %. This means that it will surely clearly surpass the Maastricht final participation of 69,69 %. The poll estimates are talking about a final participation of 75%. This is big for a topic which many said was ‘abstract’. In Spain, the particpation was in the mid forties. The majority of polling stations close at 20:00 (in 40 minutes) but in Paris and Lyon they close at 22:00.

Well it’s a beautiful hot & sunny spring day here in Barcelona. I’ve got my web-radio tuned to France Inter (France Info) and I’m working quietly away updating some things on my website. I think today is an important day for Europe, and I’m going to be blogging live as the news comes in.
Continue reading →

Looking On The Brighter Side Of Life

Posted on by

Oh come on, it’s Friday afternoon, the sun is probably shining all over continental europe, and you’re all probably off away from your desks for a weekend in the country or on the beach. So why spoil the fun. I’ll save my piece on Portugal till Monday. And meantime, you deserve something better than ‘gloomy Edward’ on such an afternoon, so why not, the opposite view: Stephen – ‘bright sider’ – Roach:

“As a congenital euro-skeptic, I will be the first to admit that it feels rather uncomfortable rising to the defense of Old Europe. But someone has to. The world is down on the Mother Continent as never before. And Europe, itself, is caught up in a bout of self-flagellation that is getting worse by the day. The risk, in my view, is that this is an overdone story of cyclical angst. While the economic outlook for Europe is far from terrific, it?s not nearly as bad as the consensus mindset would lead you to believe……. At the same time, I would concede that the tails of the political verdict could well have major impacts on financial markets. A decisive French rejection of the EU constitution could force markets to raise the probability of an EMU break-up. A ?yes? vote, by contrast, could spark a huge rally in the euro and in most-euro-denominated assets. We?ll know soon enough.”

I think I’ll deal with this, and with Henry’s arguments when the votes are safely in and counted. Have a nice weekend everyone :).

In The Interest of Fairness and Balance

Posted on by

Looking forwards rather than backwards, I can’t help trying to imagine what the world will look like on Monday. (We may all be in for a surprise, but the latest poll seems to put the ‘no’ at 55%, which is quite a large margin of error if it’s wrong, *and* Le Monde today makes the point that as the ‘no’ rises and rises in the polls, the number of undecided voters continues to reduce).

Well, ironically I think one of the consequences will be an attempt to enforce the Stability and Growth Pact. This is why I mention being fair and balanced, since in the past I may have been a little too cynical about this: although not without reason.

I now think The Pact Mark II may have considerably more bite, here’s why:
Continue reading →

Falling rate of Intelligence?

Posted on by

Conventional marxist theory used to argue that capitalism was doomed to regular and deepening crisis due to the impact of a phenomen known as ‘the falling rate of profit’. Basically the idea runs as follows: since on the marxist view labour is the only source of genuine wealth creation, and capital accumulation means that the proportion of active labour to ‘dead labour’ (capital investment) tends to decline, then the ‘rate of profit’ will diminish accordingly. Now I certainly have no intention of going into all this rigmorole, but I do remember some wit back in the seventies suggesting that if this was the case, then, for example, we could argue that intelligence must be falling, since the quantity of active human brainpower as a proportion of accumulated knowledge (living to dead ‘mental labour’) was constantly diminishing.

Well, low and behold, a paper out this week at the NBER argues just this case.
Continue reading →